On February 3rd, Electronic Arts ($EA) is planing to hold its Q3 FY2026 earnings call.

While most investors will want to see is EA beats or misses, the real story is about how the prediction market is pricing in some truly bizarre outcomes.

One of the outcome being there’s a chance the call won’t happen at all.

The rules are simple, the market resolves YES if anyone on EA’s next earnings call (including the operator, prepared remarks, or Q&A) says any one of the key terms (exact phrase, incl. plural/possessive), and NO if they don’t, or if the call doesn’t happen by March 31, 2026.

First, the mentions….

The Mention SuperMeter


The Mention SuperMeter analyzed three EA earnings calls spanning nine months (Q2 FY25, Q4 FY25, and Q1 FY26), revealing persistent patterns in executive communication rather than short-term trends.

It shows:

  1. Individual call breakdown - mentions per quarter

  2. Total mentions - across all 3 calls combined

  3. Average per call - to identify consistent patterns

  4. Heat rating - visual indicator of frequency (🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 = very hot/frequently mentioned)

Instead of relying on just one earnings call (which specific mentions in it could be an anomaly), the Mention SuperMeter reveals potential predictable patterns in corporate communication by analyzing multiple quarters, and in no specific order.

This makes predictions more reliable because you can see:

  • What they ALWAYS talked about (The Sims, Live Service, EA Sports FC)

  • What they NEVER talked about (Jared/Kushner, Saudi Arabia, Underperformance)

  • What's trending up or down over time

Notice in this case, there are zero mentions of Jared/Kushner, Saudi Arabia, and underperformance.

The Elephant in the Room: Jared Kushner Connection

The market is pricing "Jared/Kushner" at 7% and "Saudi Arabia" at 7-9%.

It looks like a deal is going to happen.

But just because something is newsworthy doesn't mean it gets mentioned on an earnings call.

You have to remember, large public companies almost universally refuse to comment on "rumors and speculation" about M&A or potential buyers.

Again, back to the Mention SuperMeter, the times when Jared/Kushner, Saudi Arabia, were mentioned across 9 months of calls, were zero.

Where the Real Edge Is

“Live services” represent 73% of EA's total business. CEO Andrew Wilson calls them "the foundation of our business." So he might not be able to avoid talking about it.

Across the calls the Mention SuperMeter analyzed, “Live Services” showed 26 total mentions (average 8.7 per call).

“The Sims” obviously mentioned much higher.

But there's something else no one is talking about: EA didn't even hold the last earnings call.

The Hidden Risk: Will the Call Even Happen?

On September 29, 2025, EA announced a $55 billion buyout by a consortium including The Public Investment Fund (Saudi Arabia), Silver Lake, and Affinity Partners (Jared Kushner's firm).

As a result, EA immediately stopped holding earnings calls.

The Q2 FY26 call (October 2025) was replaced with a press release that said Electronic Arts “will not be hosting an earnings conference call this quarter." Including a determined statement of “will no longer provide forward-looking guidance.

But also take a closer look at the words they used in press release…

But the rule is clear:

"If the earnings call does not occur by March 31, 2026, all strikes resolve to No."

So will the call happen or not? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Now there are TWO ways to LOSE on this one…

  1. Call happens, term not mentioned → No wins

  2. Call doesn't happen at all → ALL Nos win

In other words, "Yes" buyers face double jeopardy:

  • Mention risk: Will they say the word?

  • Existence risk: Will the call even happen?

Another way of putting it, "No" buyers have two paths to victory.

If EA closes the deal before February, there's no call.

But if the deal is still pending, there might be a call—but it would be the most legally scripted, risk-averse call in EA's history. Mentions could be slim.

I really like the upside on Yes contracts for Live Services, The Sims, and Skate. But there's no getting around the risk that the call won't even happen.

I guess that's the trade-off when the upside is this good.

Don’t Miss These Events!

Last Time the Market Was This Expensive, Investors Waited 14 Years to Break Even

In 1999, the S&P 500 peaked. Then it took 14 years to gradually recover by 2013.

Today? Goldman Sachs sounds crazy forecasting 3% returns for 2024 to 2034.

But we’re currently seeing the highest price for the S&P 500 compared to earnings since the dot-com boom.

So, maybe that’s why they’re not alone; Vanguard projects about 5%.

In fact, now just about everything seems priced near all time highs. Equities, gold, crypto, etc.

But billionaires have long diversified a slice of their portfolios with one asset class that is poised to rebound.

It’s post war and contemporary art.

Sounds crazy, but over 70,000 investors have followed suit since 2019—with Masterworks.

You can invest in shares of artworks featuring Banksy, Basquiat, Picasso, and more.

24 exits later, results speak for themselves: net annualized returns like 14.6%, 17.6%, and 17.8%.*

My subscribers can skip the waitlist.

*Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. Important Reg A disclosures: masterworks.com/cd.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate